Arkansas Cannabis Legalization Ballot Struck Down Despite Securing More Than Enough Signatures — Here’s Why



By Jelena Martinovic

A proposed measure to legalize leisure cannabis in Arkansas was blocked from showing on the state’s ballot this November. The Point out Board of Election Commissioners turned down the ballot title and well-known identify of the proposition after receiving enough signatures to qualify for the November ballot, reported Associated Push.

The commissioner turned down the measure on the grounds that the ballot title is not distinct adequate when it will come to the impact of the amendment, citing the difficulty of the degree of THC authorized in edible cannabis goods.

Image by Tara Winstead via Pexels

“If I’m a voter, I may possibly be all for this, but I’d like to safeguard that edible restrict,” Commissioner J. Harmon Smith reported.

Less than the proposed modification, people aged 21 and older could legally have up to an ounce of hashish, though state-certified dispensaries would be authorized to promote leisure marijuana.

Eddie Armstrong, former Arkansas Democratic Dwelling minority leader and head of the activists’ group Responsible Growth Arkansas, submitted the petitions to the secretary of state’s business very last month. He explained not too long ago that they’d collected far more than 2 times the quantity of signatures necessary to qualify the proposal for this year’s normal election.

“Because of the time frame to get this performed, they stopped at 90,000 confirmed signatures and now have moved on to the on line casino petition,” Kevin Niehaus, a spokesman for the Arkansas secretary of state’s business office, said. “Knowing how quite a few signatures they even now experienced remaining to go and with it already achieving 90,000 signatures, they felt snug indicating they made it.”

In July, the activists filed petitions that contains 192,828 voter signatures supporting the cannabis legalization amendment.

What is Subsequent?

Liable Progress Arkansas’ lawyer Steve Lancaster options to enchantment to the point out Supreme Court docket.

“The variety of detail that the board anticipated, or demanded in this case, would make our ballot title 1000’s and hundreds of words and phrases long,” Lancaster told reporters adhering to the vote. “That just merely is not workable for a ballot.”

This post originally appeared on Benzinga and has been reposted with permission.